Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Essential Skill #6 of Your Diabetic Foot Team: Evaluate Cultures and Change Antibiotics to Fight Bacteria Causing the Infection

In these discussions, we cover each of seven critical skills that your diabetic foot treatment must possess. As an educated patient you will be able to evaluate the competency of your treatment team. Having a competent team will help you prevent an amputation related to your diabetes.

Today we will discuss essential skill number six:

6. Be prepared o evaluate the cultures and change the antibiotics to most effectively fight the bacteria causing the infection.

As explained in the discussions regarding Essential skill #3 (Obtain wound cultures to determine if any dangerous organisms such as MRSA are present and use appropriate culture techniques.) it is critical that you receive the antibiotics that will be the most effective at curing your infection by killing off the bacteria.

The world is filled with bacteria. In fact keeping your skin is covered in bacteria right now. But just because you have bacteria covering your skin does not mean you are in fact it. Doctors refer to the presence of normal bacteria on the skin or in the tissue as colonization. The difference between colonization and infection is that when there is an infection, the bacteria is growing rapidly and causing damage to the tissue. Rapidly growing bacteria producing damage to the tissue is what results in a diabetic foot infections and can lead to a diabetes related amputation.

There are a number of different types of bacteria which can be found in diabetic foot ulcerations and diabetic foot infections. This is why it is important to take wound culture is and determine exactly which bacteria is the one causing the infection. This helps the doctors determine which antibiotics will be the most affective.

For example, if the infection is caused by Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic such as cephalexin (Keflex) will be highly effective. If however cultures determined that the Staphylococcus aureus is a drug-resistant strain such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) then cephalexin (Keflex) will not be affective at all. In fact, giving Keflex as a treatment for an infection caused by MRSA can even make the infection worse.

When there is a great deal of infected material available, the doctors can obtain a sample of the infection and perform a Gram stain. This is a very simple way to get a good idea, of which class of drugs might be affected. Based on this test, your doctors will likely begin antibiotics based on an educated guess of which organism it will be. This is what is known is emperic antibiotic therapy.

But within 48 to 72 hours of obtaining the wound culture is, your doctors should be receiving more detailed information about the bacteria causing the diabetic foot infection. They should also be receiving information about which antibiotic drugs to the infection causing bacteria as well as any concerns of antibiotic resistance. Based on this information, your doctors will then prescribe the appropriate antibiotics.

In the rush of taking care of multiple patients in multiple facilities at the same time, it is easy for your doctors to miss out on this information, and not receive it as soon as it's available. However, it is critical that you are started on the very best antibiotics as soon as possible.

If you have a diabetic foot infections and have not heard from your doctor for several days after cultures were taken, you should call the office and follow-up with that doctor. Otherwise, the report from the lab. That explains the wound culture results may just be sitting in a pile waiting for the doctor's signature in their office.

Treating a diabetic foot infection is an active process that plays itself out over several days. Your diabetic foot treatment team needs to be continually evaluating and reevaluating your condition as well as all of the reports that are coming in over those initial several days in order for you to be able to get better and avoid a diabetic foot amputation.

Diabetic foot amputations are preventable. Preventing a diabetes foot or leg amputation requires diligence on both the patient and the diabetic foot treatment team. Whether surgery is needed or not, the evaluation of the effectiveness of your antibiotics each to be rapid and performed at regular intervals. If you have any concerns about whether or not, you might be responding to the antibiotics you are given, always contact your doctor immediately.

Diabetes amputations are preventable. Live long and enjoy an active life!



Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot doctor. He believes diabetes related amputations are attributable to a failing health care system that neglects patient education. It is his passion to teach strategies that can empower diabetic patients and stop diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Essential #5 of Your Diabetic Foot Team: Be Prepared to Surgically Drain Infection or Remove Gangrene.

In these discussions, we discuss each of the 7 essential skills that your diabetic foot treatment must possess. As an educated patient you will be able to evaluate the competency of your treatment team. Having a competent team will help you prevent an amputation related to your diabetes.

Today we will discuss essential skill number five:

5. If necessary, be prepared to surgical drain any infection or surgically remove any dead tissue (gangrene) at the bedside (debridement).

This is a topic that is not for the squeamish. So prepare yourself.

All amputations in diabetic patients start out as some type of foot infection. The foot infection becomes worse, the bacteria rages out of control, and gangrene sets in. Gangrene is a scary term but simply means death of tissue. Dead tissue happens to be a fabulous medium for bacteria.

This skill is the one most typically referred to as “limb salvage.” If you look up the word “salvage” in the dictionary, you will find “property saved from destruction in a calamity (as a wreck or fire).”

Only by aggressively removing infected and dead tissue can the destruction of a diabetic foot infection be halted.

Emergency surgery is very common in treating diabetic foot infections. The very best way to treat a bad diabetic foot infection is by physically removing the infection…not by giving antibiotic pills. This means opening any area of infection to remove all of the bacteria. The infected compartment of the foot has to be irrigated. This is in addition to antibiotics, not instead of antibiotics.

Your team must be prepared to perform emergency surgery if the infection is bad enough that it is deemed a “limb threatening infection.” You have to keep in mind that the diabetic patient has an immune system that is weak. Because of this one is often unable to fight off an infection.

You have to also remember that poor circulation in the feet and legs (called peripheral arterial disease) is very common in diabetics. Most people with diabetes who are at high risk of a diabetic foot or leg amputation suffer from problems with the circulation in their legs and feet. Any antibiotics are delivered through the bloodstream. So poor circulation means poor delivery of the infection fighting antibiotic drugs.

In 2005, there was a research paper published in medical journal that discussed the risk of hoping to avoid surgey in diabetic foot infections. The article was entitled “Osteomyelitis of the Foot and Toe in Adults Is a Surgical Disease Conservative Management Worsens Lower Extremity Salvage.”

Osteomyelitis is the medical term for a bone infection. The point of this paper was to stress to physicians that hoping for the best and just giving antibiotics does not work. In fact, as the title suggests, that actually makes things worse. Surgery is necessary in order to save a leg from a diabetic foot infection.

Diabetes is a scary disease. Diabetic foot infections likewise can be simple or complicated. In either case, an evaluation is warranted given the potential for the loss of a limb. This should never be taken lightly. Keep in mind that most diabetic foot ulcerations do not need to end up as an amputation.

Although all of this talk about surgery, infections, gangrene and amputations can certainly be alarming, you should remember that your diabetic treatment team is on your side. As long as they are vigilant, you should be able to avoid any of these complications. Make sure you get an evaluation early whenever you notice an open sore. And if necessary, evaluate your team based on these criteria.

Diabetic foot amputation is preventable. Live long and enjoy your life!


Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot specialist. Although he has performed diabetic foot amputations, he still believes that diabetic foot amputations result from the dismal performance of a failing health care system that prevents adequate patient education. It is his passion to teach strategies that can stop diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.


Saturday, June 13, 2009

Why don’t you accept insurance?

Before I went to medical school and I would go see a doctor, I always thought that the insurance company was on my side. I would receive an explanation of benefits that showed that my insurance company had gone to bat for me and dramatically decreased the fee that the doctor was “allowed” to charge me. It made me feel as though they were protecting me from the doctor who is out to “overcharge” me.

Having been a foot doctor and surgeon in private practice who did at one time accept insurance, I realized that the insurance company is only interested in protecting their profits. In fact, the CEO of United Insurance company once stated that the insurance company would never attempt to keep doctors on the insurance plans at the expense of their profits.

Some insurance companies contracted rates that they offer as pay to doctors are so low that it is simply impossible to provide good patient care.

I once received a package via FedEx in my office from an insurance company. The delivery person said that I needed to sign for the package in order to receive it. When I opened the package there was a contract modification that dramatically reduced the rate the insurance companies said they would pay me for taking care of their members. Unbelievably, at the end of his contract was a paragraph that stated that by signing for receipt of the package constituted agreement to all of the conditions contained within the contract inside the package. It is absolutely ludicrous to think I would have agreed to rates without ever even opening a package. But these are the games that the insurance companies play.

The insurance company industry representatives have stated that any doctor should be able to see a patient in five to seven minutes. If you’ve ever been to the doctor, this is ridiculous. Now having said that, I have worked in clinics where I saw 60 people a day. I also believe that the patients did not receive quality care.

What I believe is quality care is providing evidence-based medicine as well as thorough explanations and patient education. All of this is necessary in order for a patient to participate in their own care. Providing a prescription for an order for an MRI or just an recommending that someone return in a few months is not really providing care.

Anyone with diabetes or any complicated medical condition deserves to have explanations. They also deserve to have their questions answered. And they certainly deserve more than five to seven minutes.

I have had multiple other doctors contact me and ask me for surgical second opinion on the patient. I have had many cases where these patients clearly needed a procedure that the insurance companies said they would not pay for. Those doctors then asked me what the second-best procedure was. I would supply them with my opinion. In most cases these other doctors would say, will you please come scrub in with me on the procedure that is covered by the insurance company.

In this scenario, my answer was always the same… absolutely not! , I would tell them that if you want to allow an insurance company to tell you to do the wrong procedure just because it cost them less money than you can do it yourself, and I will not participate.

At the end of 2008, I decided that under no circumstances would I allow an insurance company to tell me how long I can spend with the patient. Under no circumstances can insurance company tell me that the cheaper procedure is necessarily better. At least not better for the patient. So I opted out of Medicare and decided to no longer accept any insurance whatsoever.

High quality medical care is expensive. It doesn’t have to be prohibitively expensive, but it does have to provide the best outcome for the patient. Making decisions based only on price is a mistake for the patient. It is also a mistake to the doctor in the long run. A string of bad outcomes (whether because the wrong procedure or wrong medication was chosen) would certainly not be good for any doctors reputation. But when doctors choose to follow the guidelines of the insurance companies rather than their own medical decision-making, this is exactly what happens.

But this is not a problem for me, because I don’t accept insurance. Patient care comes first and cost is second.




Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot specialist. Although he has performed plenty of diabetic foot amputations, he firmly believes that diabetic foot amputations result from a continually worsening health care system that the force patients to live with the lowest cost treatments and deprive them of patient education. He does not accept insurance assignments of that he has the time necessary in order to provide the education for his patients that can prevent diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Your Diabetic Foot Treatment Team: Why they must evaluate the depth and character of the wound.

In these discussions, we discuss each of the 7 essential skills that your diabetic foot treatment should possess. As an educated patient you will be able to evaluate the competency of your treatment team. Having a competent team will help you prevent an amputation related to your diabetes.

Today we will discuss essential skill number four
4. Evaluate the depth and character of the wound. (Perform a wound assessment that includes both staging/grading of infection and ischemia.)
Open sores on the feet of diabetic patients are very common. These of course are referred to as diabetic foot ulcerations. Not every diabetic foot ulcer will lead to an amputation. Having said that, most diabetic foot or amputations start as a diabetic foot ulcer.

Because of this, it is extremely important for you ta make sure your diabetic foot treatment team thoroughly evaluates any diabetic wound.

Anytime you have a serious medical condition, the first question is…how bad is it? For example if you have cancer, you want to know what stage of the cancer. The stage of the cancer will tell you the extent of the spread and likelihood that you will live or die.

In the same way, staging a diabetic foot ulcer can determine whether or not your foot will live or die. Determining the wound stage will help to determine whether or not you will need to be hospitalized, have intravenous antibiotics, surgery, or even an amputation.

Before describing the staging process, let me caution you as a patient. It is my long-held belief that medical school is a way for doctors to teach student doctors how to lose their ability to communicate with patients.

Classification systems are a very good example of this. In my residency (that had a heavy focus on diabetic foot training), my director understood this more than most. In our surgical conferences if a student or resident doctor mentioned a classification of any condition, Dr. Young would always demand that they explain exactly what that classification meant. This is a vital skill for clear communication. It shows that the doctor can know and explain what is really going on.

Many doctors lose disability. They become so familiar with the technical language and classification schemes, that they are simply unable to describe in simple terms what they see when they evaluate a wound, an illness or a condition.

So without giving you all the specifics about each of the different classification schemes, we will explain what the components are that need to be evaluated and why each is important.

The first component of a diabetic foot ulcer (open wound) classification system that should be evaluated by your treatment team is the size of the hole. It doesn’t really matter how big it is across your foot, but it doesn’t matter how deep. The skin on the foot is very thin and when a diabetic ulcer gets deeper, tendons, ligaments, and bone can become exposed and damaged or infected. Bones and joints that is clearly exposed to the external world through an open diabetic wound can only very rarely be saved.

Not surprisingly, as the wound becomes deeper. The condition is taken much more seriously. In general, skin will not just grow in and cover exposed tendons and ligaments, joints or bones. Action must be taken. In many cases this means surgery. A hope and a prayer is rarely enough.

Once your team has decided how deep it (and what tissues are exposed through the wound) they should next determined whether or not infection is present. This is usually not difficult. Any experience treatment team should be able to determine easily if the wind is infected or not. By definition, if your team cultures the wound, they believe that it is infected. See essential number three.

Next they should determine whether or not there is sufficient blood flow to heal the wound. Poor blood flow to an area is referred to by doctors as “ischemia.” You have to remember that any antibiotics are delivered to the foot through the bloodstream. If the blood flow is poor, the antibiotics can’t even get to the site where the battle is taking place. In addition, there is very little chance of the wound healing without good blood flow.

If the ischemia (or poor circulation) gets bad enough, gangrene can set in. Gangrene is nothing more than death of the tissue. It is often related to infection. Obviously is critical to your team and evaluates the blood flow to your feet whenever you have a diabetic foot wound.

If you have ischemia and an open sore on a single toe, and your treatment seem decides to amputate that toe, it is possible that the blood flow is so bad that the amputation site won't heal. This could create an even larger problem hole in your foot. It is a very basic tenant of diabetic foot surgery that the level of amputation must have sufficient blood flow to heal. Otherwise you may end up with each of your little piggy’s going to market one at a time.

By evaluating the depth of the wound ( including skin, tendon, joint, and bone involvement), presence or absence of infection, and presence or absence of ischemia, a much more realistic prognosis can be determined. All of these factors must be considered in order to determine whether or not the wound is likely to heal without hospitalization and/or surgery.


If you have a diabetic foot ulceration that is being treated without evaluating all of these factors, it might serve you well to seek a second opinion. You should also feel you have the liberty to ask your doctor whether or not you have an infection, any ischemia, or exposed tendon or bone. This is your right. Expect your doctor to explain what is going on.

Beware of doctors who feel you don’t deserve answers.

Diabetes is a complicated disease. Diabetic foot problem likewise can be simple or complicated. In either case, an evaluation is warranted given the potential for the loss of a limb. This should never be taken lightly. Keep in mind that most diabetic foot ulcerations do not need to end up as an amputation.

Although all of this talk about amputations can certainly be frightening, you should remember that your diabetic treatment team is on your side. As long as they are vigilant, you should be able to avoid any of these complications. Make sure you get an evaluation early whenever you notice an open sore. And if necessary, evaluate your team based on these criteria.

Amputations are preventable. Live long and enjoy life!


Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot specialist. Although he has performed diabetic foot amputations, he still believes that diabetic foot amputations result from the dismal performance of a failing health care system that prevents adequate patient education. It is his passion to teach strategies that can stop diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation”
at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

How to Check Your Diabetic Feet

Amputations are preventable. Having said that, you must understand that an amputation is not preventable if you have already developed gangrene and a bone infection (known as osteomyelitis).

However, gangrene and bone infections are always preceded by much smaller problems. The key with any diabetic foot amputation prevention program is to make sure that you are watching out for the smaller problems. If you check your feet twice a day, you will always be able to seek immediate treatment and prevent an amputation, before it is too late.

Your daily diabetic foot check should include several points of inspection. First and foremost, inspect your socks when you remove them from your feet. Anyone who is diabetic should only wear white diabetic socks. And you ask "why white?"

Well it turns out, there was a study that compared two goups of diabetic patients. I in the study, one group was given white socks and the other was given dark socks. At the end of the study, it was shown that patients who wore white socks had a lower risk of developing the type of complications that can lead to hospitalization and diabetic foot or leg amputations.

The reason for this is actually quite simple. If you develop a blister or draining open sore, it is very easy to see the drainage and know there is a problem if your socks are white. It is very difficult to see this sort of drainage on a dark colored sock. So look at your socks as soon as you take them off.

Once you have removed your socks, you should inspect the bottoms of your feet. Any area of redness or open wounds demand immediate attention. Areas that are red, hot, or swollen can signify an infection. Diabetic foot infections are easy to treat when they first start, but become much more difficult to treat as time progresses. Early intervention is the key.

If you are inflexible and it is difficult for you to see the bottoms of your feet, use a mirror specifically designed to help you see the bottoms of your feet. An illuminated mirror works best. Otherwise have someone help you look at your feet.

Always inspect between the toes. Look for open sores or area of white-ish discoloration of the skin. This can mean that your skin is becoming too moist between the toes. This can also put your risk of skin breakdown and an open sore. If you notice these sorts of problems, immediately see your doctor.

Next inspect the heels. The skin on the heels will frequently become dry and cracked in diabetic patients. This is the opposite problem of too much moisture that occurs between the toes. Even though it is the opposite problem, it can still lead to an open sore. Any open sore can serve as an opening for bacteria to get in and cause a diabetic foot infection.

Make sure to use lotion on the heels that is specifically designed for those with diabetes. Keeping the heels soft and supple will prevent the skin from cracking that can lead to a diabetic foot ulceration and the infection that ultimately leads to amputation.

Check the borders of the toenails to make sure that your toenails are not becoming ingrown. If you notice redness or drainage immediately seek treatment from a foot doctor. I myself have performed multiple amputations on diabetic patients that started out as nothing more than a neglected ingrown toenail.

By performing these simple daily diabetic foot checks, you can stay ahead of the diabetic foot game and stay out of trouble. When it comes to diabetes and your feet, a little preventative maintainance goes a long way.


Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot specialist. Although he has performed many diabetic foot amputations, he believes that diabetic leg amputations result from a failing health care system and inadequate patient education. It is his passion to teach strategies that can stop diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.

Monday, June 8, 2009

Your Diabetic Foot Treatment Team: Why they should obtain wound cultures to determine if any dangerous organisms such as MRSA are present.

In these discussions, we discuss each of the 7 essential skills that your diabetes treatment team must use in order to help you prevent an amputation related to your diabetes.

Today we will discuss essential skill number three
3. Obtain wound cultures to determine if any dangerous organisms such as MRSA are present. Use appropriate culture techniques.

The primary reason that a person ends up with a diabetic foot amputation is because of a poor blood supply and uncontrolled infection. When ever a diabetic foot ulceration (open sore) develops, bacteria that is normally growing on the skin will live within the wound.

Doctors call this colonization. Colonization is what a normal process. Your entire skin is colonized with bacteria. In most instances, colonized bacteria do not cause harm or disease. The difference between colonization and infection is that one is a normal process and another causes harm.

One definition of infection is “to do well in internally endoparasitically as opposed to externally.” A parasite always lives at the expense of its host. When bacteria in an open wound on a diabetic foot begins to invade the tissue, rather than just living on the surface a diabetic foot infection begins.

In order to remove any infecting bacteria it is important to differentiate the organism causing the infection from other organisms that are normally growing on the skin and may not be causing any harm. The most reliable way to differentiate these two groups of bacteria is by obtaining a wound culture.

A wound culture is a process whereby a doctor obtains a sample of infectious material and places it in an artificial medium, where it will grow. The basic idea, is to take samples of the bacteria in the wound and transfer them to a petri dish and place them in an incubator. The bacteria will then start to grow.

If several samples of different antibiotics are placed with in the petri dish and marked, the bacteria will not grow, near the antibiotics to which they are susceptible. This is how doctors determine which antibiotics are likely to kill the bacteria and remove the infection from a diabetic foot.

In order to remove an infection, you must take the appropriate antibiotics. This can only be determined accurately with a culture.

Not only is it important to take a wound culture and make sure that a diabetic foot infection is being treated correctly, timing is also important. It takes a couple of days for cultures to determine which antibiotics are going to be effective. Because of this, most diabetics with an infected open sore will be started on antibiotics that are probably going to work. It is critical that the wound culture is taken before these antibiotics are given. Once antibiotics have been given, but when cultures become unreliable.

If the diabetic foot infection is not treated with the right antibiotics, they can take much longer to remove the infection. Most antibiotics are processed and removed from the bloodstream by the kidneys. Diabetics are at high risk for kidney damage. Often times when someone who is a diabetic takes antibiotics for a long period of time, they can damage the kidneys further. This can lead to complete renal failure, which places the patient on dialysis. A diabetic patient who has had kidney failure will die without dialysis to remove impurities from the blood.

This being the case is understandable why it is important to make sure that any antibiotics taken are going to the effective and only administered for the shortest period of time.

Whenever you go to the emergency room or see a doctor because you believe that you have an infected diabetic foot ulceration, you must insist that cultures are obtained before you start any antibiotics. This will help speed your healing, minimize the chances of any kidney damage, and reduce the risk that you will end up with a diabetic leg amputation.

Keep in mind that early treatment is key. If you believe that you are developing a diabetic foot infection, you should seek treatment immediately. No matter what time of day or night. You should call your treating physician and explain to them, what is happening so that treatment can begin right away.

This is why it is so important for everyone with diabetes to have a doctor that they feel they can call at any hour to discuss their concerns. In most cases, a short discussion can help you determine whether or not, you need to get out of bed and go to the emergency room or if this is a smaller issue, or if it can wait until the next day.

No issue is too small to discuss with your diabetes doctor. Diabetics are at extraordinary risk for having what seems like a minor problem end up as a life-changing amputation. Amputations are preventable.


Dr. Christopher Segler is an award winning diabetic foot specialist. Although he has performed many diabetic foot amputations, he believes that diabetic leg amputations result from a failing health care system and inadequate patient education. It is his passion to teach strategies that can stop diabetic amputations. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Honey for Wound Dressings... Is It Scam or Science?

One of the “newest” topical wound dressings is a form of medical grade honey. Honey is actually not a new dressing. It has been used for about thousands of years. There have been documented reports of honey being used in Egypt around 2,000 B.C.. It was also documented as a wound treatment in the Middle Ages.

But recently it has been gaining popularity again. That’s right, the favorite food for Winnie the Pooh. People are putting honey right on burns, radiation therapy wounds and diabetic foot ulcers. The questions is, why would a food product help a wound. Today we will discuss the medical reasoning behind honey as a diabetic wound dressing.

One of the interesting properties of honey is that it is very resistant to spoilage. No refridgeration required. For some reason, it just doesn’t get infested by microorganism like other foods left at room temperature. We will see that this is one of the properties of honey that is important in helping wounds heal.

So how then does honey help wounds? It turns out that honey has several properties that aid in wound healing. First, honey smeared on a wound forms a protective physical barrier, like a liquid band-aid. It keeps moisture in and bacteria out of the wound.

Second honey has a low pH of about 3.6 (7.0 is neutral). Bacteria don’t really grow well in acidic environments so this slight acidity retards their growth. The best environment for healing a wound is one which is friendly to the tissue to unfriendly to bacteria. Honey is both.

The third characteristic of honey that is good for wounds is its hygroscopic properties. This means that the honey can actually soak up excess moisture in the wound. Too much moisture can impede healing while providing food for bacteria that can turn into an infection.

The fourth interesting property of honey is that it is truly antibacterial. Honey contains an enzyme called peroxidase which is added to the nectar gathered by honey bees. This enzyme causes hydrogen peroxide to be present in the wound in just the right concentration that it kills bacteria, without being toxic to the human cells that are healing the wound. In addition, the plant nectar that is collected by the bees can influence the antibacterial properties of the honey. Honey collected from the Leptospermum species in New Zealand and Australia seems to be particularly antibacterial.

There is good science behind all of this as well. One of the first clinical studies of honey as a wound dressing was in 1988. In that study, it was shown that honey could reduce the number of positive wound cultures in burns and gangrene. This just means that less wounds were growing bacteria.

Since that time, many other studies have shown promising properties for honey in the treatment of leg ulcers, venous wounds, and the prevention of infection by dangerous bacteria such as MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). Several other studies have since shown that honey does work in keeping antibiotic resistant strains from growing in wounds. This is important because antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria, sometimes referred to as “superbugs” are on the rise. When antibiotic drugs don’t work, the infection can run rampant and lead to an amputation or even death.

Although the original use of honey as wound dressing hundreds or even thousands of years ago has been effective, scientist have developed it further to make it most effective. The original application was right from the source, just plain old honey. The medical-grade honey used in wound care is purified, sterilized, and contains the optimal concentrations of anti-bacterial agents.

Honey is available everywhere, but now even medical-grade honey is available without a prescription. It is also FDA approved. Supermarket honey may work much as it did thousands of years ago, but it is not tested to determine its wound healing properties. In addition, it may contain impurities which would be harmful to the wound. Honey appears to be an effective treatment for many types of wounds even though it is an ancient remedy.



Dr. Christopher Segler is an extensively published author and award winning diabetic foot specialist. Once he realized how diabetic leg amputations are resulting from a lack of patient education, it became his passion to teach strategies to stop diabetic amputation. You can learn more by requesting your FREE report “No Leg Left To Stand On: The Secrets Insurance Companies Don’t Want You To Know About Diabetic Foot Amputation” at http://www.ineedmyfeet.com.